Digital Assets & Virtual Assets
CARF in Hong Kong: What the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework Means from 2027
A comparison of Hong Kong's three main onshore fund structures: Unit Trust, Open-ended Fund Company (OFC), and Limited Partnership Fund (LPF). Key features, regulatory requirements, tax treatment, and guidance on choosing the right structure.
Hong Kong has invested significantly in its investment fund ecosystem over the past decade, introducing two new onshore fund structures, the Open-ended Fund Company (OFC) and the Limited Partnership Fund (LPF), to complement the established unit trust structure. These vehicles offer fund managers and investors a choice of onshore vehicles that are competitive with offshore alternatives (Cayman Islands, BVI) while benefiting from Hong Kong's tax regime, legal system, and fund ecosystem. This guide compares the three main structures and helps managers and investors determine which is best suited to their needs.
The unit trust is the most established onshore fund vehicle in Hong Kong, with a history dating back decades. It is a contractual arrangement (governed by a trust deed) under which a trustee holds fund assets on behalf of unitholders. Unit trusts are widely used for both SFC-authorised retail funds and non-retail (professional investor) funds.
The OFC was introduced in 2018 and is governed by the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) and the Securities and Futures (Open-ended Fund Companies) Rules. It is a corporate structure specifically designed for collective investment schemes, combining a familiar corporate form with the flexibility of an open-ended fund. OFCs can be used for both SFC-authorised retail funds and privately placed professional investor funds.
The LPF was introduced in August 2020 under the Limited Partnership Fund Ordinance (Cap. 637). It is a limited partnership structure designed specifically for closed-ended investment funds, modelled closely on the Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (ELP). The LPF is particularly suited to private equity, venture capital, and real estate funds where capital is drawn down over time and returned to investors via distributions rather than redemptions.
| Feature | Unit Trust | OFC | LPF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legal form | Trust (contractual) | Company (corporate) | Limited partnership |
| Separate legal personality | No (held by trustee) | Yes | No (held by GP) |
| Open or closed ended | Either | Open-ended only | Closed-ended only |
| Redemption of interests | Yes (open-ended) | Yes | No (distributions only) |
| Feature | Unit Trust | OFC | LPF |
|---|---|---|---|
| Key parties | Trustee, manager, unitholders | Custodian, investment manager, directors, shareholders | General partner (GP), limited partners (LPs) |
| Independent governance | Trustee oversight | Board of directors (majority independent for retail funds) | No requirement; GP has full management control |
| Liability of investors | Limited to subscription amount | Limited to subscription amount | LPs: limited to capital commitment; GP: unlimited (mitigated by using a corporate GP) |
| Feature | Unit Trust | OFC | LPF |
|---|---|---|---|
| SFC authorisation required for retail? | Yes (SFC-authorised funds) | Yes (public OFCs) | Not applicable (closed-ended) |
| Registration / filing | No separate registration (governed by trust deed) | Registered with SFC and Companies Registry | Registered with Companies Registry |
| Investment manager requirement | SFC-licensed manager (for authorised funds) | SFC-licensed investment manager required | Registered investment manager required (SFC-licensed or registered under LPF Ordinance) |
| Annual audit | Yes (audited accounts required) | Yes | Yes |
All three structures can qualify for Hong Kong profits tax exemption under the unified funds exemption regime (Sections 20AM–20AX of the Inland Revenue Ordinance), provided:
In 2023, Hong Kong introduced a profits tax concession for carried interest paid by eligible LPFs and OFCs to qualifying recipients, taxed at an effective rate of 0% (100% deduction). This was a major step towards making Hong Kong competitive with Cayman for PE/VC fund formation.
Key tax considerations for each structure:
The OFC is designed to replicate the functionality of the SICAV (Société d'Investissement à Capital Variable) structure familiar from Luxembourg and other European jurisdictions. Key features include:
The LPF is Hong Kong's answer to the Cayman ELP and is the preferred vehicle for closed-ended PE/VC funds. Key features include:
The choice of fund structure depends on the fund's strategy, investor base, and operational requirements:
For many years, the Cayman Islands exempted limited partnership (ELP) and Cayman exempted company dominated Hong Kong-managed fund structures due to their flexibility, tax neutrality, and investor familiarity. The introduction of the LPF and OFC (and the profits tax exemption and carried interest concession) has significantly narrowed the gap. Key remaining advantages of Cayman include:
However, the Hong Kong government's ongoing commitment to developing the fund ecosystem, including potential introduction of a closed-ended fund company structure, suggests that the gap will continue to narrow.
The Inland Revenue (Amendment) (Preferential Tax Regimes for Funds, Family-owned Investment Holding Vehicles and Carried Interest) Bill 2026 was gazetted on 12 June 2026 and is before the Legislative Council. It has not yet been enacted, but it is expressed to take effect retrospectively from the year of assessment 2025/26, and the Inland Revenue Department has confirmed that eligible taxpayers may claim on that basis in their 2025/26 returns pending enactment. Anyone structuring a fund now should plan against the Bill rather than the current text.
The changes that matter most in practice:
The Government has said it has no plans to expand the concessions further, and clarified in August 2026 that proprietary trading businesses are not "funds" and cannot access the carried interest concession. The second reading debate is expected in the second half of 2026.
The Bill also tightens. New section 20AMA imposes an economic substance requirement on the fund itself, being at least two qualified Hong Kong employees and at least HK$2 million of Hong Kong operating expenditure. New sections 20AZ to 20AZE create a mandatory tax reporting mechanism backed by new criminal offences, and there is a specific anti-round-tripping rule aimed at loans. All of it applies retrospectively to the year of assessment 2025/26, so a manager with no Hong Kong headcount needs to look at this now.
We have published a detailed analysis of the Bill, covering both the relaxations and the new substance and reporting obligations that come with them: the 2026 Funds, FIHV and Carried Interest Bill.
Hong Kong's investment fund landscape has matured considerably with the introduction of the LPF and OFC, giving fund managers genuine onshore alternatives to Cayman. The choice between unit trust, OFC, and LPF depends on fund strategy, investor base, regulatory obligations, and tax considerations. Early legal structuring advice is essential to ensure the optimal vehicle is selected and properly established.
Alan Wong LLP advises fund managers and investors on the structuring, establishment, and ongoing compliance of Hong Kong investment funds across all three structures. Contact us to discuss your fund formation requirements.
Disclaimer: This article is provided for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. It should not be relied upon as a substitute for specific legal advice on any particular matter. No solicitor-client relationship is created by your access to or use of this article. The law may change, and its application will depend on the specific facts and circumstances of each case. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we accept no responsibility for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this article.

Hong Kong's 2026 Bill rewrites the Unified Fund Exemption, carried interest and FIHV regimes. What it relaxes, the new substance and reporting duties, and the caps most notes get wrong.

How the IRD tests a Hong Kong settlement or re-invoicing entity: source of profits, the offshore claim, substance, transfer pricing and FSIE.