Digital Assets & Virtual Assets
RWA Tokenisation in Hong Kong: Legal Framework and Structuring Guide

A legal and regulatory guide to Security Token Offerings (STOs) in Hong Kong: SFC framework, security token classification, prospectus requirements, intermediary licensing, tokenised bonds and funds, and practical compliance checklist.
Security token offerings (STOs) represent one of the most significant intersections of traditional securities law and blockchain technology. By representing ownership interests in real-world assets — equity, debt, real estate, funds — as digital tokens on a blockchain, STOs promise to democratise access to traditionally illiquid asset classes and streamline issuance and secondary market trading. Hong Kong, as a leading international financial centre, has engaged seriously with STOs and established a regulatory framework that applies existing securities law rigorously to token-based securities. This guide explains the legal and regulatory requirements for conducting an STO in Hong Kong.
A security token is a digital token that represents a security within the meaning of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO) (Cap. 571). The SFO defines "securities" broadly to include:
Tokens that carry rights analogous to any of these — e.g., profit participation rights, ownership rights in an asset pool, or debt repayment obligations — are likely to constitute securities under the SFO regardless of the technology used to represent them. The SFC's position, stated in multiple circulars, is that it applies a substance-over-form test: a token that functions as a security is a security.
By contrast, tokens that are merely used as a means of accessing a platform or service (utility tokens) and that do not confer rights analogous to securities are generally not securities under the SFO. However, many tokens in practice have mixed utility and security features, requiring careful legal analysis.
In March 2019, the SFC issued a circular on Security Token Offerings setting out its regulatory position. Key points:
Following the development of the VASP regime and the broader virtual asset regulatory framework, the SFC has updated its guidance on security tokens and tokenised securities. Key developments include:
If a security token constitutes a "share" or "debenture" as defined in the CWUMPO, offering it to the public in Hong Kong requires either:
In practice, the vast majority of STOs in Hong Kong are conducted as private placements to professional investors, avoiding the prospectus requirement and the associated cost and disclosure obligations.
If the security token represents interests in a collective investment scheme (e.g., a tokenised fund), offering it to the public in Hong Kong requires SFC authorisation of the scheme under Section 104 of the SFO, or an applicable exemption (e.g., professional investor or private placement exemption). The SFC's Code on Unit Trusts and Mutual Funds (and related codes) applies to publicly offered collective investment schemes.
Persons involved in the marketing, distribution, and secondary market trading of security tokens must hold the appropriate SFC licences:
Licensed intermediaries dealing in security tokens must comply with AML/CFT requirements under the AMLO. Issuers should also conduct KYC on investors (particularly in private placements) to ensure compliance with applicable AML laws in Hong Kong and relevant investor jurisdictions.
One of the key promises of STOs is liquidity through secondary market trading on blockchain-based platforms. In Hong Kong, secondary market trading of security tokens is subject to:
Two categories of tokenised securities have attracted particular attention in Hong Kong:
The Hong Kong government issued tokenised green bonds in 2023 and 2024, demonstrating the feasibility of blockchain-based bond issuance. The legal framework for tokenised bonds uses the existing bond issuance framework (prospectus or private placement) with the blockchain layer added for record-keeping and transfer. The SFC and HKMA have both issued guidance on tokenised bonds, clarifying that the same regulatory requirements apply as for conventional bonds.
In 2023, the SFC issued guidance on tokenised funds (including tokenised SFC-authorised funds), confirming that tokenised versions of SFC-authorised funds are permissible subject to meeting specific conditions (including enhanced disclosure on tokenisation arrangements, custody requirements, and investor eligibility). This opens the door for asset managers to issue tokenised fund units on blockchain platforms while maintaining SFC authorisation.
Hong Kong offers several advantages as a jurisdiction for STOs:
Security token offerings in Hong Kong are fully regulated under the existing securities law framework, with the SFC applying a substance-over-form approach that treats security tokens identically to conventional securities. While this creates compliance obligations for issuers and intermediaries, it also provides legal certainty and investor protection that enhance the credibility of the STO market. With clear regulatory guidance, a sophisticated investor base, and growing infrastructure for tokenised securities trading, Hong Kong is well-positioned as a leading venue for STOs in Asia.
Alan Wong LLP advises on the legal structuring of STOs, token classification analysis, offering document preparation, and SFC regulatory compliance. Contact us to discuss your security token project.

A practical guide to having Hong Kong documents notarised and authenticated for use in Canada, covering the Hague Apostille Convention, province-specific requirements, common document types including immigration and real estate documents, and how Alan Wong LLP can help.

A comprehensive guide to equity fundraising mechanisms available to Hong Kong-listed companies under the HKEX Listing Rules, covering rights issues, open offers, top-up placements, general and specific mandates, and the key disclosure and shareholder approval requirements.