Digital Assets & Virtual Assets
RWA Tokenisation in Hong Kong: Legal Framework and Structuring Guide

A detailed guide to the SFC Type 9 (asset management) licensing regime for hedge fund and investment managers in Hong Kong, covering the licensing process, financial requirements, responsible officer obligations, code of conduct compliance, and ongoing regulatory obligations.
For investment managers and hedge fund operators looking to establish or expand their presence in Hong Kong, obtaining a Type 9 (Asset Management) licence from the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) is the central regulatory requirement. A Type 9 licence authorises the holder to manage securities and futures portfolios on behalf of clients, and is required for any firm or individual carrying on asset management business — including managing hedge funds, private equity funds, family office mandates, or discretionary accounts — in Hong Kong.
This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the SFC Type 9 licence, including who needs one, how to apply, the financial and governance requirements, and the ongoing compliance obligations that licensees must meet.
A Type 9 licence is required for any person who carries on a business of managing securities or futures portfolios in Hong Kong. This includes:
Certain exemptions exist — for example, managing portfolios solely for wholly-owned group companies, or providing purely incidental management services — but these are narrow and should be carefully assessed. Firms managing virtual assets (where those assets constitute securities) also require Type 9 licensing.
The SFC licensing process for a new asset management firm typically takes three to six months from submission of a complete application, although complex cases or applications requiring significant back-and-forth with the SFC may take longer. The key steps are:
Before submitting an application, the firm should:
Applications are submitted electronically through the SFC's WINGS (Web-based Intermediary New Generation System) portal. The application package includes:
The SFC will conduct a detailed review of the application and will typically request supplemental information or clarifications. In many cases, the SFC will interview the proposed responsible officers to assess their competence, experience, and fitness to act in that capacity. The interview process can be detailed and probing — ROs should be well-prepared to discuss their investment experience, compliance knowledge, and the firm's risk management approach.
The Responsible Officer (RO) is one of the most important concepts in SFC licensing. At least two ROs must be approved for each regulated activity, and at least one RO must be an executive director of the licensee who is actively involved in the day-to-day management of the business.
Each proposed RO must satisfy the SFC that they are fit and proper, which involves assessments of:
Once licensed, ROs are personally responsible for ensuring the firm's compliance with the SFC's requirements. ROs must:
Type 9 licensees managing a collective investment scheme are subject to the higher liquid capital requirement and must maintain:
Type 9 licensees not managing a CIS are subject to lower financial requirements. All licensees must monitor their financial resources on an ongoing basis and submit quarterly financial returns to the SFC.
The SFC's Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC sets out the detailed conduct standards that all licensees must meet. Key requirements relevant to Type 9 licensees include:
In addition to the general Code of Conduct, the SFC's Fund Manager Code of Conduct (FMCC) applies specifically to Type 9 licensees managing collective investment schemes. The FMCC sets out detailed requirements for portfolio management, risk management, valuation, disclosure to investors, and governance.
All SFC licensees must implement robust AML/CFT policies and procedures in accordance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Ordinance (AMLO) and the SFC's AML/CFT guidelines. This includes customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, suspicious transaction reporting, and record-keeping.
Type 9 licensees must submit quarterly financial returns, annual audited accounts, and other periodic reports to the SFC. They must also promptly notify the SFC of material changes in their business, key personnel changes, and any regulatory concerns or incidents.
Fund managers whose investment mandate includes virtual assets (including cryptocurrencies) face additional regulatory requirements. Where the fund's virtual asset portfolio exceeds 10% of its total NAV, the manager must be licensed for Type 9 and comply with the SFC's applicable circulars and guidance on virtual asset management. The SFC has published detailed requirements addressing custody, valuation, and risk management for virtual asset portfolios.
Alan Wong LLP advises fund managers and investment advisers on all aspects of SFC licensing and ongoing regulatory compliance in Hong Kong. Our services include:
The SFC Type 9 licensing regime reflects Hong Kong's position as a sophisticated and well-regulated asset management centre. For investment managers establishing or growing their Hong Kong presence, obtaining a Type 9 licence is a significant but manageable undertaking with the right preparation and specialist legal support. The key to a successful application lies in thorough preparation, experienced and well-qualified responsible officers, and a robust compliance framework that demonstrates to the SFC that the firm is ready to operate to the highest professional standards.
This article is for general information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice on SFC licensing or fund management regulation, please contact Alan Wong LLP.
Hong Kong documents intended for use in South Korea require notarisation and apostille under the Hague Convention. This article explains the authentication process, common document types, and practical steps for ensuring your documents are accepted by Korean authorities.
Impact investing seeks to generate positive social and environmental outcomes alongside financial returns. This article examines the growing impact investing ecosystem in Hong Kong, fund structures, measurement frameworks, and the regulatory landscape for social impact funds.